The Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DCI) has strongly denied allegations of blocking former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua. The controversy surrounds a recent church service in Nairobi.
In a statement released on Tuesday, the DCI rejected Gachagua’s claims. The agency maintained its commitment to professional conduct and public safety.
Former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua.Courtesy photo
The former Deputy President had alleged being prevented from attending church. He claimed security agencies attempted to restrict his movement.
This incident occurs amid heightened political tensions in Kenya. Gachagua recently faced impeachment from his deputy president position.
The DCI emphasised its role in maintaining law and order. They stated that no orders existed to prevent Gachagua’s church attendance.
The agency further clarified its operational procedures. They assured the public that they respect citizens’ religious freedoms.
This development follows earlier serious allegations by Gachagua. He had previously claimed there were assassination attempts against him.
The DCI is currently investigating these assassination claims. They had summoned Gachagua to provide evidence supporting his allegations.
Security experts have weighed in on the situation. They emphasise the importance of maintaining professional relationships between security agencies and politicians.
Political analysts note growing tensions in recent weeks. The relationship between Gachagua and state agencies has become increasingly strained.
Church leaders expressed concern about the allegations. They called for respect of religious spaces and worship rights.
The DCI spokesperson detailed their standard operating procedures. These guidelines ensure fair treatment of all citizens regardless of status.
Legal experts commented on the constitutional implications. They highlighted citizens’ rights to worship without interference.
Civil society groups called for calm and dialogue. They urged both parties to resolve their differences through proper channels.
Members of Parliament have shown interest in the developing situation. Some called for parliamentary discussion of the matter.
Security arrangements for former state officers remain under scrutiny. The incident has sparked debate about their protection protocols.
The DCI reaffirmed its commitment to professional standards. They promised continued fair treatment of all citizens.
Religious leaders urged for separation of politics from worship. They emphasised the sanctity of religious spaces.
Political observers noted the timing of these allegations. They came shortly after significant changes in national leadership.
The agency outlined its mandate in providing security. They explained their role in protecting both current and former state officers.
Security committees are reviewing existing protocols. They aim to prevent similar misunderstandings in future.
Government spokesperson assured of continued cooperation. All security agencies will work together to maintain peace.
Local leaders called for peaceful resolution of differences. They emphasised the need for unity in national leadership.
The DCI maintained its professional approach to duties. They rejected any suggestions of targeting specific individuals.
Constitutional experts outlined rights and responsibilities. They explained legal protections for both citizens and former state officers.